30% of the fees collected from swaps and leverage trading conducted on the platform are converted to either ETH or AVAX and distributed to GMX stakers.
In that case, suddenly, a large number of users in the market using USDC stablecoins to buy LINK tokens in stock, the number of LINK tokens in the GLP liquidity pool will decrease dramatically, and the increased utilization of funds will prompt the contract to go long. The funding rate of LINK will rise rapidly. In other words, the price impact of large transactions on the liquidity pool is still there, but the cost is passed on to traders as funding rates.
GMX is a decentralized copyright, meaning that it is not controlled by any central authority. This ensures that the GMX network is secure, transparent, and resistant to censorship.
The website also details GMX and GLP’s market capitalizations and highlights the project’s partnerships, integrations, and related community projects. It furthermore includes a documentation section, which provides information on the exchange’s various components, and suggests methods to bridge to Arbitrum or Avalanche, or to acquire GMX and GLP tokens. Thanks to its detailed dashboards, GMX gives off an impression of transparency. As a result, the protocol’s mechanisms are relatively simple to grasp.
DEXs allow users to trade as if they were on a traditional CEX, but with their funds safely in the custody of their personal copyright wallet. Many DEXs also permit trading without requiring users to complete the Know Your Customer (KYC) process, which attracts many traders looking to preserve their anonymity.
The most apparent drawback for traders is the small selection of assets in the GLP liquidity pool, as they can only trade with a few cryptocurrencies. There is a potential additional risk of sudden spikes in funding rates, which dynamically adjust to asset utilization in the GLP liquidity pool. For example, suppose you choose to go long on LINK tokens in the contract market of the GMX platform, and soon after, you open a position.
On the surface, the GMX protocol fulfills the wishes of almost all liquidity providers: long-term, stable, low-risk, high-yielding gold flows. But the truth is less rosy than it seems because GLP liquidity pools are more than just deposits and lending like banks. Their excess returns well above the general market interest come from traders’ forfeited margin, and the increased risk taken is traders’ profit.
A total of 30% of the fees generated from swaps and leverage trading on the GMX exchange are converted to ETH / AVAX and distributed to read more all the staked GMX tokens. If you are staking your GMX tokens on the Arbitrum Blockchain you would receive ETH, if you are staking on the Avalanche Blockchain then you would receive AVAX.
The amount of rewards that users can get, depends on the number of GMX staked and the fee revenue generated on the GMX copyright Exchange. Based on historical data, the estimated annual GMX yield ranges from 15–30%.
The founder details of GMX are not prominently disclosed, aligning with the decentralized ethos of the platform which focuses more on collective governance and community-driven development.
Introducing funding fees determined by the open interest of long and short positions, facilitating balance between the two through arbitrage.
The profit from the closed position is taken out of the GLP liquidity pool. The profit from closing the position will be removed from the GLP liquidity pool, while the loss will be deducted from the margin.
Because the GMX protocol improves the traditional liquidity pool model, users of the GMX exchange may benefit or be at risk depending on what decentralized financial services they use and what role they play in the GMX exchange.
Isso Facilita os investidores por longo prazo da GMX a obter muitas recompensas, mas se a GMX desmarcar, uma quantidade correspondente do MP igualmente será queimada.